For carriers, underwriting & strategy teamsWho we serve
15Rock Research

Benchmark and underwrite against a peer set you can defend.

Competitive and operational benchmarking, underwriting market intelligence, and peer analysis for life, health, and P&C carriers — every comparison tied back to its source.

The work

The work we do for your team.

W01

Competitive & peer benchmarking

Where you stand against a defensible peer set on growth, cost, and operating metrics — not a generic index.

W02

Underwriting market intelligence

Source-linked reads on segments, perils, and competitors to sharpen underwriting and appetite.

W03

Operational benchmarking

Function-level benchmarks — claims, contact-center, IVR, and expense ratios — against true peers.

W04

Product & distribution scan

Map the competitive landscape across products, channels, and geographies with the evidence behind it.

W05

M&A & portfolio screening

Screen a universe of carriers or MGAs into a ranked, evidenced shortlist.

W06

Recurring market briefs

Standing coverage of your lines and competitors, refreshed on a cadence.

What you’ll get

Artifacts your team can defend.

Artifact

Benchmarking report

Competitive and operational benchmarks against a defensible peer set, every comparison sourced.

Artifact

Underwriting brief

Market and competitor intelligence for an underwriting or appetite decision.

Artifact

Peer & landscape analysis

A competitive dossier across products, channels, and geographies.

Artifact

Source appendix

Every chart and claim traced back to its underlying source.

From the work

Peer-benchmarked

A leading life & health insurer's benchmarking, delivered against a defensible peer set — every comparison source-linked.

Used by teams like

A leading life & health insurerLife, health & P&C carriersUnderwriting & strategy teams

One source-to-decision workflow behind every artifact.

Ingest → source map → claim engine → validation → reviewer loop → cited artifact → audit trail. Every material claim is traceable.

Bring one workflow. Review one defensible output.

Start with a contained pilot on your own sources and methodology — and see whether the reasoning layer is strong enough for the work you have to defend.