Skip to main content

Map · Find · Diagnose · Plan · Monitor

Find where your market opportunities are.Then build the intelligence around them.

For advisory, investment, strategy and public-sector teams: commission research from our analysts, run on our own platform and built on your expertise. Start with one project, then keep us on to monitor what changes, quarter by quarter.

research deliveries
300+
sectors covered worldwide
20+

Work across Canada, the US and Southeast Asia

Our work is used by a global advisory firm, a Canadian pension investor and a Southeast Asian lender.

As of September 2026

What we do

Five capabilities, one loop.

Each capability answers one question. Start at any step; each cycle points to the next.

  1. How does this market work, and where are the gaps?

    You getValue-chain map

    Map capability
  2. Which ones should we go after first?

    You getScorecard and shortlist

    Find capability
  3. Where is the value, or the risk?

    You getDiagnostic and peer benchmark

    Diagnose capability
  4. What should we do, and what is it worth?

    You getValue creation plan

    Plan capability
  5. What changed since the last review?

    You getQuarterly monitoring read

    Monitor capability

All five capabilitiesHow it works

Who we work with

Start from your team.

A recent engagement

From a long list to the targets worth pursuing first.

140 → 12

An advisory firm

The question
Which of roughly 140 organizations in one market should our partners pursue first?
Scope
Every organization in the market, scored against the practice’s own service lines.
What we delivered
A scan of the market, a ranked shortlist of about 12 priority targets, and an opportunity matrix showing where the value sits at each.
What it enabled
Partners used it to decide which organizations to approach first.

Products

Three ways to work with us.

Each product starts with the question in front of you and ends with a view that stays current. Unrelated clients have independently asked us to encode their own framework and run it again.

  1. 01

    Opportunity Assessment

    For governments, economic development agencies and firms entering a region or sector.

    “We’re looking at a sector. How does it work, and who matters?”

    We map the value chain, screen the companies in it, brief you on the strongest targets and keep the picture current as contracts, capital and policy shift.

    Defence edition: the Defence Opportunity Assessment

    Capabilities: Map, Find, Monitor.

    How we deliver it

  2. 02

    Portfolio Coverage

    For pension investors, private equity funds and the advisers who serve them.

    “How does each holding measure up against our framework?”

    A baseline on every holding, then a quarterly read on what moved, why it moved and what it is worth.

    Capabilities: Diagnose and Monitor, with Plan when something moves.

    How we deliver it

  3. 03

    Company Value

    For advisory teams and corporate strategy groups.

    “Our margins trail our peers. Where is the value?”

    A value scan, a plan to close the gaps, and tracking that shows whether the plan is working.

    Capabilities: Diagnose, Plan, Monitor.

    How we deliver it

Sector depth

Our deepest coverage is in defence and aerospace, energy and the transition, healthcare, retail and consumer, financial services, and industrial manufacturing.

Explore defenceAll industriesAll five capabilities

Illustrative examples

Research in practice.

  1. MapWhere are the gaps in our region’s supply chain?
    Economic development team · Value-chain map · Region AIllustrative · fictional figures

    What we foundComposite structures and maintenance are where investor attraction would do the most. Two firms need site visits before we score them.

    You sentThe program’s supply-chain categories and the companies in your region.

    What came back

    • Precision machining

      Companies in region
      14
      Could enter with modest change
      6
      Gap
      None
      Confidence
      Confidence · high
    • Composite structures

      Companies in region
      2
      Could enter with modest change
      3
      Gap
      Thin: one qualified supplier
      Confidence
      Confidence · medium
    • Maintenance and repair

      Companies in region
      0
      Could enter with modest change
      2
      Gap
      Open: no local capability
      Confidence
      Confidence · medium

    Value-chain map

  2. DiagnoseWhere does this issuer need a closer look?
    Risk teams · Framework assessment · Issuer AIllustrative · fictional

    What we foundTwo sites are unlocated. Specialist review is needed before scoring.

    You sentYour risk framework, the issuers and the permitted inputs.

    What came back

    • Physical exposure at main sites

      Evidence found
      Site disclosures; public hazard map
      Gap
      Two sites unlocated
      Status
      Specialist review
    • Transition plan

      Evidence found
      Annual report
      Gap
      None
      Status
      Confidence · high
    • Disclosure quality

      Evidence found
      Regulatory filing
      Gap
      Supplier emissions basis partial
      Status
      Confidence · medium

    … and each other holding in the portfolio

    Risk and climate against your framework

  3. PlanShould we build, buy or partner?
    Strategy teams · Business case · Business unit AIllustrative · fictional

    What we foundPartner stays low-confidence until the terms are reviewed.

    You sentThe options, constraints and the internal facts we may use.

    What came back

    • Build

      Evidence for
      Existing capability; slower to scale
      Key assumption
      Hiring at pace
      Work to test it
      Capacity plan against internal data
      Confidence
      Confidence · medium
    • Buy

      Evidence for
      Two candidates fit the criteria
      Key assumption
      Price within range
      Work to test it
      Company briefs on both
      Confidence
      Confidence · medium
    • Partner

      Evidence for
      One partner covers the region
      Key assumption
      Exclusivity acceptable
      Work to test it
      Terms review
      Confidence
      Confidence · low

    Value creation plan

  4. MonitorWhat changed since the last review?
    Portfolio team · Quarterly read · Holding BIllustrative · fictional figures

    What we foundWorking capital moved the wrong way. Worth a question before the board pack goes out.

    You sentNothing new. The baseline and your criteria are already on file.

    What came back

    • Gross margin vs peers

      Baseline
      −3.1 pts
      This quarter
      −1.8 pts
      Change
      Improving
      Next step
      None
    • Working capital days

      Baseline
      62
      This quarter
      71
      Change
      Worse
      Next step
      Ask management
    • New disclosure

      Baseline
      None
      This quarter
      Supplier concentration
      Change
      New risk
      Next step
      Deep dive offered

    Quarterly monitoring read

Illustrative examples with fictional companies and criteria—not measured results.

Anonymized engagements

Research used in real work.

Three more anonymized examples of delivered research, and an engagement that grew from a pilot—not measured financial outcomes.

  1. 01Peer-benchmarked

    The question
    How does the business compare against an agreed peer set?
    Delivered
    A leading life & health insurer's benchmarking, delivered against a defensible peer set — every comparison source-linked.
  2. 02Portfolio-wide

    The question
    Which issuers across the portfolio need a closer look?
    Delivered
    Source-linked ESG, climate, and risk screening across an institutional investor's portfolio — issuer by issuer.
  3. 0334 clients assessed

    The question
    Which of our clients have a credible way into defence supply chains?
    Delivered
    An advisory firm’s defence team had 34 of its clients assessed against defence procurement and industrial-participation opportunities.

Another engagementPilot → annual · An institutional investor expanded from a pilot to an annual engagement.

All engagement examples

How we start

From your question to a written scope.

Start with a pilot

One question, one bounded piece of work.

Your question
One live question, with the decision it serves.
Your inputs
Your list and your rubric, or a starting set we agree with you.
What comes back
A reviewed answer with a point of view: a ranked shortlist, a brief or a benchmark.
The evidence
A source appendix, with anything unverified flagged.

Scope, format and delivery date are agreed before work starts. If the pilot earns its place, it becomes a recurring engagement on your calendar.

  1. 01

    Review

    A partner reads your question and the material you can share.

  2. 02

    Reply

    You receive a scoped response within one business day.

  3. 03

    Scoping call

    A short call focused on the question you want answered.

  4. 04

    Written scope

    The question, inputs, deliverable and delivery date, set out before work starts.

Start with one question

What’s your next move?

Bring us a target, a peer set, a market or a business question. Let’s discuss the research that would help.